In March, 2012, the
Supreme Court heard an unprecedented three days of arguments on whether the
government can make citizens do what's "best" for themselves--i.e.
pay for healthcare, eat low salt foods, etc. In late June, they announced their
ruling: Obamacare is constitutional--because it really is a tax, that is. This
leaves that big question somewhat unanswered.
What does that have
to do with church leadership? At the core, the question was about the
government's right to force people to do the right thing. And this question is
very pertinent to church leaders. The argument goes something like this...
ON ONE HAND...
Our government was
not designed to give our leaders great power to effect great change. The
Framers designed government to limit the damage leaders can do. They believed in the fallen nature of man and
feared what fallen men in power would do. Most of all, they feared another
monarchy, saying, "A government capable of doing great good quickly is
also capable of doing great harm quickly." Limited government, based on an
educated and mature citizenry.
ON THE OTHER HAND...
If you have the
power to make people's lives better, shouldn't you? Don't parents make their
kids eat their vegetables? I do. My 2 year old daughter doesn't get to choose
whether she eats green beans at dinner.
And those same
Framers also said, "Why has government been instituted at all? Because the
passions of men will not conform to the dictates of reason and justice without
constraint."
We already have to
drive the speed limit. I live in a neighborhood association that requires us to
keep our house presentable. (I'll refrain from discussing the picture sent to
me of our offending overgrown vine trellis...that had to have been taken from
within my back yard! Nothing quite like petty tyrants, eh?)
This is a
fundamental leadership question--not just a governmental leadership question.
Maybe we should also require everyone to go to church? In Austria, where my
brother lived up until this past December, if you register as a church member
your tithes are automatically deducted from your paycheck--government enforced.
Isn't that good? They're helping people make the choice they're supposed to
make anyway. It just makes it easier for them to do what's right.
MY OPINION...
My position depends
on whether we're talking short-term or long-term--oh, and there's a crucial
assumption required.
CRUCIAL ASSUMPITON…
We're assuming that
the government will choose well, when it tells us what to do. We're assuming
that our leaders won't enforce the wrong thing. No, I'm not about to suggest
that Obama and his party are out to destroy America. That's as immature as
blindly accepting their judgment. I think they're doing their best. But
government leaders aren't any more free of the struggle with sin than the rest
of us--complete with the blind spots and miscalculations we all have. But, for
the sake of our argument, let's make this HUGE assumption and move on.
In the short-term,
it's very good for people to have their leaders require them to make wise
choices. Good behavior increases and lives are improved. Success!
But in the
long-term, there's a terrible price to pay. The more leaders decide for their
people, the more they remove the need for people to learn how to make good
decisions. The wisdom of the people will atrophy. Yes, I do require my toddler
to eat well, but if I continue to treat my children like toddlers as they grow
up, I will stunt their ability to think and choose wisely when I'm not around.
From Awake From Atrophy:
Jacob frowned back and leaned forward intently. “I
would agree that most of the believers in a typical church wouldn’t know what
to do if you said, ‘Go minister to each other.’ But I believe members’
inability to minister without being told exactly what to do is an indication of
immature or selfish leadership, not immature or selfish members.”
Drew’s eyebrows rose skeptically. “How is that the
leader’s fault? We’re wearing ourselves out trying to get them to grow up!”
“It’s kind of like bad parenting,” Jacob explained,
unfazed by Drew’s outburst. “You may have seen parents who did so much for
their children, who worked so hard, but allowed their children to do little, so
that their children became adults in name only. The adult children remained
dependent on their parents. It’s like always making your child drink from a
sippy cup, even into their teens, to be sure they don’t spill anything.
Instead, as every good parent knows, as children grow they need increasing opportunities
to make their own decisions. Yes, they will make mistakes. Yes, when you take
the lid off the cup, they will spill their drink sometimes. And, no, it’s not
wise to leap from zero responsibility to total life responsibility. I wouldn’t
move from sippy cups straight to crystal goblets. But to never take the lid off
their cup is even worse.
“When pastors decide that members will never be able
to minister as mature adults because they aren’t ready, it usually comes from
one of two postures. In the best case, they have no idea there is another
option, which I think describes the great majority of pastors. But, in the
worst case, there are probably a few pastors who also crave the sense of
importance that comes from having members so very dependent on them—just like
poor parents.”
CONCLUSION…
Most churches have
more of an Obamacare-approach to leadership than empowering the individual.
They're deciding for their people. On giving: they advocate a 10% tithe left up
to the staff to manage. On music and teaching: the staff (and a few key volunteers
in small churches) decide what happens--and then do all the execution on
Sundays. Even in small groups, the rare opportunity for members to minister in
a typical church--they're given step-by-step curriculum. Typical church leaders
choose everything that needs to be done, then they teach, cajole, and pressure
their members to do what exactly that. When do members get to make any
decisions?
The more policies
like Obamacare that are enacted, the less individually mature our citizens will
become. If you want a preview of an immature nation, over-dependent on their
leaders, just look at a typical church--at the prevalence of "cultural-Christians"
and the edge-of-burnout lifestyle of the staff and few volunteers.
No comments:
Post a Comment